2022-05-17                     House Journal                      Page 3013
HB 172                                                                                                                        
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                                  
House consider the Senate message (page 2971) on the following:                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 172(FIN) am                                                                                          
     "An Act relating to crisis stabilization centers, crisis residential                                                       
     centers, and subacute mental health facilities; relating to                                                                
     representation by an attorney; relating to the administration of                                                           
     psychotropic medication in a crisis situation; relating to                                                                 
     hospitalizations for mental health evaluation; relating to licensed                                                        
     facilities; relating to a report to the legislature on psychiatric                                                         
   patients and patient rights; and providing for an effective date."                                                          

2022-05-17                     House Journal                      Page 3014
and                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 172(FIN)                                                                               
     "An Act relating to crisis stabilization centers, crisis residential                                                       
     centers, and subacute mental health facilities; relating to                                                                
     evaluation facilities; relating to representation by an attorney;                                                          
     relating to the administration of psychotropic medication in a                                                             
     crisis situation; relating to the use of psychotropic medication;                                                          
     relating to licensed facilities; relating to psychiatric patient rights;                                                   
     amending Rule 6(a), Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and                                                                   
     providing for an effective date."                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     (SCR 23 - title change resolution)                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved that the House concur in the Senate                                                                   
amendment and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                                                      
amendment?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 172(FIN)                                                                                                               
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  36   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  1                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields,                                                                      
Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman,                                                                  
Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Ortiz,                                                                   
Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story,                                                             
Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman, Kurka                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Merrick                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Rauscher                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                                              
SCS CSHB 172(FIN).                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                              
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                            

2022-05-17                     House Journal                      Page 3015
Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll                                                             
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court                                                        
rule change.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
There was objection.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall the court rule change be adopted?"  The                                                             
roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SCS CSHB 172(FIN)                                                                                                               
Court Rule(s)                                                                                                                   
Concur                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  37   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields,                                                                      
Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman,                                                                  
Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Ortiz,                                                                   
Patkotak, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder,                                                                     
Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool,                                                            
Zulkosky                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Nays:  Eastman, Kurka                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Merrick                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
And so, the court rule change was adopted.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
The Chief Clerk notified the Senate.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.